电信用户下载1  Audio download

电信用户下载2  Audio download

网通/教育下载  Audio download

请将您的听写稿直接在此贴下跟帖。如果您是根据已贴出的听写稿进行修改，请在您的跟帖中用红笔注明修改之处，具体的听写规则请查看新手指南版块或者听写版块置顶贴。

下载常用网上听写复读机，请点击此处


提示：本站将保留最近2个月内的听力音频视频资料，如果以上听力文件无法播放则表示已经在论坛删除，请到博客英语网听力库下载以前的文件，点击此处进入听力库

homework

The vaulted camera in your hands in 1920s,was the hold of the future,the photographer/felt the camera made her contemporary being part/ ,

Writer,James Eugene,call the camera"the central instrument of our time",Hungarian artists,LN,believed that the camera offered the new vision,that was sparked 20 century renaissance,"anyone who fails to understand photography",he said,"will be one of illiterates of the future"

In 1920s,was perhaps a decade of the most in tense debate,has towards the photography is full,what is good at,what world is going to play in,the art of the future,only in this society of the future.

But what language did photography speak,and who was interested with himself?The future of the p/,the methods,or the individual,societies,or its own.

It is the medium he need to wrestle with and take control of,or it's something that he is perhaps at his best when artists ringed in,leaving the photographers' function areas,it's sort of operetta.

In Germany,the nation struggling with trauma and chaos of defeat,photographer offered calamity,rationality and order,but this surprise best-sellers in 1925,was called Russfelts artforms of nature,which was reviewed in ravishing detail,the precision engineering that underpainted the vegetable world.

Cover had made huge / albums of different platforms,and there is hilarity,'cause if they be mading cast iron,they're quite extraordinary,and he ranges from side by side,so you can see all the difference in the platforms,so it's kind of phycopediat desire to recall the world's serious typology,using the new shiny commercial papers ot 1920s.

The potential for making records,places,people,and things,have been one of photography's trapcards from the outside,the first typology are an un-skeleton of /,appear just  5 years after the mediums' invention.

太难了，偶等着学习，贡献几个人名：
Bernice Abbott
James Agee
Lazlo Moholy-Nagy
Karl Blossfeldt
Anna Atkins

非常感谢查找这些人名呢
期待您发作业哦，您提交的作业或改稿一直都是高质量呢

on melody-m


The hold of camera in your hands in 1920s,was the hold of the future,the photographer/felt the camera made her contemporary being part/ ,

Writer,James Eugene,call the camera"the central instrument of our time",Hungarian artists,LN,believed that the camera offered a new vision,that was sparked  a 20 century renaissance,"anyone who fails to understand photography",he said,"will be one of illiterates of the future".

In 1920s,was perhaps the decade of the most intense debates,has toward the/the/ photography is full.what is it good at,what role is it going to play in,the art of the future,only in this society of the future.

But what language did photography speak,and who's interestes itself?The future of the passed,the methods,or the individual,societies,or its own.

It is the medium you need to wrestle with and take control of,or it's something that he is perhaps at his best when artists ringed in,leaving the photographers' function areas,it's sort of operetta.

In Germany,the nation struggling with  the trauma and chaos of defeat,photographer offered calamity,rationality and order,but what surprise best-sellers in 1925,was called Russfelts artforms of nature,which was reviewed in ravishing detail,the precision engineering that underpainted the vegetable world.

Cover had made huge / albums of different platforms,and there is hilarity,'cause if they be made in cast iron,they're quite extraordinary,and he ranges from side by side,so you can see all the difference in the platforms,so it's kind of phycopediat desire to recall the world's serious typology,using the new shiny commercial papers ot 1920s.

The potential for making systematic and accurate records,places,people,and things,have been one of photography's trapcards from the outside,the first typology are an un-skeleton technology,appear just  4 years after the mediums' invention.

To hold a camera in your hands in the 1920s was to hold the future. The photographer Bernice Abbott, felt camera made her the contemporary being part *; writer James Agee, called the camera the central instrument of our time; Hungary artist Lazlo Moholy-Nagy, believed a camera offered a new vision that would spark a 20th century renaissance. Anyone who fails to understand photography, he said ‘will be one of the illiterates of the future’.

“The 1929s was perhaps the decade of the most intense debates as to what photography is for, * is good at what rose is going to play in the art of the future, we`ve known the society of the future.”

But what language did photography speak? And whose interests does it serve? The future or the past? The masses or the individual? Societies or its own?

“Is it the medium that unit to wrestle, even take control of, or is it something that is perhaps at its best when artist radian, living the photographers as the function era as a sort of operator?”

In Germany, a nation struggling with the trauma and chaos of defeat, photography offered clarity, rationality and order. What of the surprise best sellers of 1925, was called Blossfeldt, art forms of nature, which reviewed in ravishing detail, the precision engineering that on depend the vegetable world.

“Karl Blossfeldt made huge compendious albums of different plant forms, and there is heredity because if they be made in carsdine, they are quite extraordinary and he ranges them side by side so you can see all the difference in the, in the plant forms, and it`s a kind of encyclopedia desired to record the world`s series of typologies, using the new shining commercial papers of the 1920s.”

The potential for making systematic and accurate records of places, people and things, had been one of geography trump cards with the outside, the first typology, Anna Atkins catalog avalogy appeared just 4 years after the medium`s invention.

The hold a camera in your hands in the 1920s, was to hold /of/ the future, the photographer Bernice Abbott felt the camera made her the contemporary being part *; writer, James Agee, called the camera "the central instrument of our time"; Hungarian artists, Lazlo Moholy-Nagy, believed a camera offered a new vision, that would spark/ed/ a 20th century renaissance, "anyone who fails to understand photography", he said, "will be one of the illiterates of the future".

“The 1920s, was perhaps the decade of the most intense debates, as to what photography is for. What is it good at, what role is it going to play in the art of the future, we`ve known the society of the future.”

But what language did photography speak, and whose interests does it serve? The future of the past? The masses or the individual? Societies or its own?

“Is it the medium that you need to wrestle, even take control of, or is it something that /he/ is perhaps at its best when artists ringed in, leaving the photographers as what function era as it is sort of operator.”

In Germany, a nation struggling with the trauma and chaos of defeat, photography offered clarity, rationality and order, what of the surprise best-sellers of 1925, was called Blossfeldt, art forms of nature, which /was/ reviewed in ravishing detail, the precision engineering that on depend the vegetable world.

“Karl Blossfeldt /had/ made huge compendious albums of different plant forms, and there is heredity because if they be made in cast iron, they're quite extraordinary, and he ranges them side by side, so you can see all the difference in the, in the plant forms, so it's a kind of encyclopedia desired to record the world's series of typologies, using the new shiny commercial papers of the 1920s.”

The potential for making systematic and accurate records of places, people and things, have been one of a geography`s trump cards from the outside, the first typology, Anna Atkins catalog avalogy appeared  just 4 years after the mediums' invention.

on sylvia_qian

To hold a camera in your hands in the 1920s was to hold the future. The photographer Bernice Abbott felt the camera made her "the contemporary being par excellence." Writer James Agee called the camera "the central instrument of our time." Hungarian artist\ Laszlo (mea culpa...) Moholy-Nagy believed the camera offered a new vision that would spark a 20th century renaissance. "Anyone who fails to understand photography," he said, "will be one of the illiterates of the future."

The 1920s was perhaps the decade of the most intense debates as to what photography is for. What is it good at? What role is it going to play in the arts of the future or even in the society of the future?

But what language did photography speak? And whose interests did it serve, the future or the past, the masses or the individual, society's or its own?

Is it the medium that you need to wrestle with, even take control of, or is it something that is perhaps at its best when artists rained in leaving the photographers as a sort of functionary, as a sort of operator?

In Germany, a nation struggling with the trauma and chaos of defeat, photography offered clarity, rationality and order. One of the surprise bestsellers of 1925 was Karl Blossfeldt's Art Forms in Nature, which revealed in ravishing detail the precision engineering that underpin the vegetable world.

Karl Blossfeldt made huge compendious albums of different plant forms, and there is heraldic as (what the heck is that?) if they be made in cast iron. They're quite extraordinary and he ranges them side by side so you can see all the difference in the, in the plant forms. So it's a kind of encyclopedic desire\ to record the world as a series of typologies using the new shiny commercial papers of the 1920s.

The potential for making systematic and accurate records of places, people and things have been one of \ photography's trump cards from the onset. The first typology, Anna Atkins' catalog of algae, appeared just four years after the medium's invention.

on ktdid



To hold a camera in your hands in the 1920s was to hold the future. The photographer Bernice Abbott felt the camera made her "the contemporary being par excellence." Writer James Agee called the camera "the central instrument of our time." Hungarian artist\ Laszlo Moholy-Nagy believed the camera offered a new vision that would spark a 20th century renaissance. "Anyone who fails to understand photography," he said, "will be one of the illiterates of the future."

The 1920s was perhaps the decade of the most intense debates as to what photography is for. What is it good at? What role is it going to play in the arts of the future or even in the society of the future?

But what language did photography speak? And whose interests that it served, the future or the past, the masses or the individual, society's or its own?

Is it a medium that you need to wrestle with, and take control of, or is it something that is perhaps at its best when artists rained in leaving the photographers as a sort of functionary, as a sort of operator?

In Germany, a nation struggling with the trauma and chaos of defeat, photography offered clarity, rationality and order. One of the surprise bestsellers of 1925 was Karl Blossfeldt's Art Forms in Nature, which revealed in ravishing detail the precision engineering that underpinned the vegetable world.

Karl Blossfeldt made huge compendious albums of different plant forms, and there,  as heraldic as if they'd been made in cast iron. They're quite extraordinary and he ranges them side by side so you can see all the difference in the, in the plant forms. So it's a kind of encyclopedic desire\ to record the world as a series of typologies, using the new shiny commercial papers of the 1920s.

The potential for making systematic and accurate records of places, people and things had been one of \ photography's trump cards from the outset. The first typology, Anna Atkins' catalog of algae, appeared just four years after the medium's invention